Getting rid of James Campbell was also a good move, although they need to replace him with a real reader’s rep, instead of another liberal apologist. I applied for the job, but, I assume since my phone still ain’t ringin’, it still ain’t them (for all you blue-noses out there, that’s a line from an old Eddie Raven song).
Our ultimate goal at CoB is to shame the HC into giving its readers both sides of most issues. I can’t tell you the number of people I know, that when I asked them if they read a certain story in the HC, tell me, “I don’t read that liberal rag”. It would be beneficial not only to conservatives if they would be fair, but it would be good for the Chronicle’s circulation (which has been falling like a ‘you-know-what’ in a well in recent years) as well. That’s a real conundrum for them, no? Do what’s good for business, or press your liberal agenda.
A lot of the bias that exists in the Chronicle is what is omitted, that is, what I call the “No-No’s”, so we are adding a feature by that same name. A major No-No is anything or anyone that disagrees with the religion of man-made global warming. It won’t appear in the HC. An example of that would be the coming cold spell.

Analysis by Roy E. Yates